Go Back   WAHM Forums - WAHM.com > >

Welcome to the WAHM Forums - WAHM.com.

Welcome to WAHM Forums

Already registered? Login above 

OR

To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of the largest community of Work-At-Home Moms.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2011, 04:20 AM
anng's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 3,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by writermommy View Post
I think it is grammar score. Those saying that they flat out got fired had 3.5 and below. Those of us in WEP seem to have 3.6/3.7. I haven't seen anyone with higher than a 3.7 total score say they have been placed in. For those with a 3.7 and lower who dodged WEP or being flat-out fired, maybe there was another factor mixed in.
I saw a message on another forum from someone with a 4.0 saying they were put in WEP, but they also hadn't written for DS for a few months, so I don't know if inactivity is playing a role. I have a 3.7 and have not been put in WEP, but I also started in late March/early April, so I have technically been through the WEP this year already when I started and that might make a difference.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2011, 04:05 PM
Super WAHM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 443
Default

So I just got my first article back from the three. The edit requests are ridiculous. There's no way I can fulfill it. Impossible. I guess I'm parting ways with DMS. So scary because I depended on it.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2011, 04:20 PM
WAHM Regular
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 57
Default

My problem with DM is that they should have taken this into consideration before they hired new writers. If writers didn't average out to 4.0 or whatever number that they are looking for, then they shouldn't have been hired to begin with. That's why I like WG. At least they give good feedback and several test batches before you are considered "hired".
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2011, 04:58 PM
WAHM Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluegrassGal View Post
@ThisIsMiss:
Were you just fired without given a chance to writer three articles for evaluation? I'm really curious about this. Do you mind sharing more details?
I know this question wasn't directed towards me, but I just want to say that I only got to write one of the three articles before they fired me. And the ironic thing is, the article I did write got approved. So what gives?
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2011, 05:19 PM
Jonelle's Avatar
Awesome WAHM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 964
Default

No one can make any sense out of the latest DS fiasco. Very sorry this happened.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2011, 05:28 PM
Awesome WAHM
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 873
Default I received an email...

I received an email stating that I was placed in the program. I was ecstatic and speedily finished my articles only to find that they sent me another email denouncing it was a technical error.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 08-10-2011, 09:13 AM
WAHM Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Default

Just FYI everyone...I'm not in the program but have read some of the posts on the DS forum. Several people have reported making it through the program and being restored to 10 articles at a time. Take it for what it's worth; it doesn't indicate how many people are making it through, but it does mean some are. Good luck everyone.

Quote:
I received an email stating that I was placed in the program. I was ecstatic...
Huh? Or are you being sarcastic? I'm confused.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off