Go Back   WAHM Forums - WAHM.com >

Welcome to the WAHM Forums - WAHM.com.

Welcome to WAHM Forums

Already registered? Login above 

OR

To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of the largest community of Work-At-Home Moms.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 12:14 PM
kamie3535's Avatar
WAHM Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7,222
Default



U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions Unveils Massive Numerical Impact Of Senate Immigration Bill





Monday, May 15, 2006



<DIV title="Media Link" align=center>



<DIV =pressappRelease title="Release " alt="Release ">


WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) today unveiled an impact analysis that shows the Senate immigration bill – should it become law – would permit up to 217.1 million new legal immigrants into the United States over the next 20 years, a number equal to 66 percent of the total current population of the United States.


Even if the maximum levels are not reached, the increase to the U.S. population caused by S. 2611 will be at least 78.7 million in 20 years, just over 25 percent of the total current population. This lower estimate assumes that the bill's escalating caps on certain visas will not increase at all over the next 20 years; if the bill's caps are hit each year, the total number will be the higher estimate.


“Until now, most of us have focused on securing the border and deciding how to treat the illegal alien population already in the United States,” Sessions said. “Few, if any, of us have looked ahead to see what the long-term numerical impact of the bill would be. My staff and I have just completed such a study, and the results are shocking.”


Sessions discussed his findings at a news conference today, along with Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who released his own analysis showing similar numbers.


“As we begin debate today on the floor, my goal is to get these numbers before my colleagues so that they can appreciate just how breath-takingly unsatisfactory this 614-page Senate bill is,” Sessions said. “We know that this country is going to treat the illegal alien population fairly. However, if the Senate wants to be successful in passing immigration reform, it should produce a bill that secures the borders and the workplace and establishes a commonsense, carefully thought out, legally enforceable policy for legal immigration in the future. For our immigration system to work, the Senate bill must guarantee that today’s facade of enforcement and illegal immigration flows won’t exist in the future.”


If the current legal immigration level (950,000 a year for 20 years or 18.9 million over 20 years) is excluded from the total, according to Sessions, the Senate bill could be described as increasing legal immigration by 59 million to 198.2 million over 20 years.


“These are actually very conservative estimates,” Sessions said. “For example, for the low end, we assumed the caps would never escalate, and we only added an average of 1.2 immediate family members coming in with each alien worker. Additionally, our numerical analysis did not add in estimates of future illegal immigration flows, or include any estimates for chain-migration – the parents, brothers and sisters that new citizens can bring in on a permanent basis.”


Chain-migration occurs when an immigrant becomes a citizen. Citizens have a legal


right to bring in family members other than spouses and children. They can bring in their parents, their adult siblings and the spouses and children of their adult siblings.


“You can see how the potential exponential growth impact of the Senate legislation will cause consternation on the part of Congress and the American people ,” Sessions said.


The Senate bill would increase permanent future immigration into the United States in several ways.





LOW SKILLED PERMANENT IMMIGRATION:


H-2C Workers: By creating a new (H-2C) visa category for “temporary guest workers” (low skilled workers) with an annual “cap” of 325,000 that increases up to 20 percent each year the cap is met, the bill allows at least 6.5 million, and up to 60.7 million new guest workers to come to the United States over the next 20 years. There is nothing “temporary” about these workers. Employers may file a green card application on their behalf as soon as they arrive in the United States, or the worker may self-petition for a green card after four years of work.


H-4 Family Members of H-2C Workers: By creating a new visa category (H-4) for the immediate family members of the future low-skilled workers (H-2C), and allowing them to also receive green cards, the bill would allow at least 7.8 million, and up to 72.8 million immediate family members of low-skilled workers to come to the United States over the next 20 years.


HIGH SKILLED PERMANENT IMMIGRATION:


H-1B: The bill would essentially open the borders to high-skilled workers, as well as low-skilled workers. By increasing the annual cap of 65,000 to 115,000, automatically increasing the new cap by 20 percent each year the cap is hit, and creating a new exemption to new cap for anyone who has an “advanced degree in science, technology, engineering, or math” from any foreign university, the number of H-1B workers coming into the United States would undoubtedly escalate. The 20-year impact of this escalation could be anywhere from 1 million to 20.1 million. H-1B workers are eligible for green cards and would be allowed to stay and work in the United States for as long as it takes to process the green card application.


STEEP INCREASES TO ANNUAL GREEN CARD LIMITS:


Family Based Green Cards: The bill would increase the annual cap on family based green cards available to non-immediate family members (adult sons and daughters, adults siblings, and the spouses and children of adult siblings) by more than 100 percent, upping the current cap of 226,000 to 480,000 a year. Immediate family members are already able to immigrate without regard to the family based green card caps. The 20-year impact of this change would be an increase of 5.1 million non-immediate family member green cards.


Employment Based Green Cards The bill would increase the annual cap on employment-based green cards by more than 500 percent, upping the current cap of 140,000 to 450,000 until 2016 and to 290,000 thereafter and exempting all immediate family members that currently count against the cap today (spouses, children and parents) from the newly escalated cap. The new exemption would result in an average of 540,000 family members receiving green cards each year of the first 10 years, and an average of 348,000 family members receiving green cards each year of the second 10 years. The 20-year impact of this change would be an increase of 13.5 million employment-based green cards, for a total of 16.3 million employment-based green cards issued over the course of the next 20 years.


http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=255553
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 01:16 PM
Dream's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,054
Default



[img]smileys/smiley11.gif[/img]I find it really amazing that someone finally figured out what was going on here! Did everyone else fail math or what!


If we have millions of illegals in this country now, shouldn't they get the green cards or be thrown out?! Oh no, that would be racist and cruel! Let them all be citizens and start from scratch! Let's bring in several million more to do this green card thing with. Soon everyone will catch on and the United States of America will look like Mexico. With a few rich people and everyone else working for pennies and trying to get into Canada. [img]smileys/smiley7.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 01:20 PM
kamie3535's Avatar
WAHM Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7,222
Default

Canada will never allow it! They are smart enough to build a damn fence.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 01:56 PM
Dream's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,054
Default

Do you really think that will stop the invasion! [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 01:59 PM
Dream's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,054
Default

Oh I know I will get slammed for this, but why don't the mexicans use some kind of birth control. Their population is exploding down there and I guess up here too. Is this really our problem that they keep mass producing when they can't mass support!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:07 PM
kamie3535's Avatar
WAHM Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7,222
Default

Ain't touching this with a 10 foot pole! [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:18 PM
Dream's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,054
Default

I know I am living dangerously these days! [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]But I heard what their population increase was in Mexico this morning (on the 700 club) and it is really, really high. That is one of the reasons so many are coming here and it will get worse. They don't have enough jobs down there as it is and of coure most of the jobs pay peanuts, so they go elsewhere which is of course is, HERE!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:29 PM
Latinmom76's Avatar
Super WAHM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 404
Default



Dream, look at your source.


Really gals, there are other issues in the world. You are obsessed with this one.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:37 PM
Dream's Avatar
WAHM Addict
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,054
Default



You don't like Pat, imagine that! [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]


No I'm not obsessed, LOL! Are you obsessed with sayng that people are obsessed about this? [img]smileys/smiley36.gif[/img]Sorry, couldn't resist. Look I am not trying to start anything or offend anyone, I was just putting it out there, that's all.


The Mexican populations is a concern and you can see what problems it is causing down there. You don't agree? If the problem stayed down there then it wouldn't be any of my business, but because of that problem and other problems down there it has now become our problem.


President Fox hand out some condoms for crying out loud! [img]smileys/smiley23.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:40 PM
Latinmom76's Avatar
Super WAHM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream


[img]smileys/smiley11.gif[/img]I find it really amazing that someone finally figured out what was going on here! Did everyone else fail math or what!


If we have millions of illegals in this country now, shouldn't they get the green cards or be thrown out?! Oh no, that would be racist and cruel! Let them all be citizens and start from scratch! Let's bring in several million more to do this green card thing with. Soon everyone will catch on and the United States of America will look like Mexico. With a few rich people and everyone else working for pennies and trying to get into Canada. [img]smileys/smiley7.gif[/img]


Nobody is going to give them citizenship right off the bat. It's a temporary worker program. Again, not all immigrants are from mexico. Nobody is trying to invade, you want to see a real invasion, look at Iraq, that's an invasion. You are seeeeriously stretching this situation very very very very very far.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off