Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcnab
I think they got rid of good explanations in the previous versions and added too much stuff that is specific for certain aspects. There are more details now for some ratings but the ones that need more instructions are still missing. I also don't like the fact that they removed the old spam and rating examples as well as the spam by language exam,ples. The new ones are too general or too specific with limited content. The 40 page guideline is more useful than this one on a page per page basis, this one is pretty much spam  I don't like the fact that they removed the chicken breast recipe example since I applied that to everything hehe.
|
I agree with NewName, I think the new guidelines are more specific. What I found when I clicked thru the new "spam" links was spam that was in English, Japanese and other languages, I thought it was good. I also found some info in there that I didn't realize and this is my 2nd year as a rater. I and Generally get good report cards (does that really matter don't know).
I think this guideline is more specific and better written. Yeah there is still stuff that isn't spelled out, but since rating is somewhat like a survey they can't please everyone, if they did then we'd be clones.
I have definitely found some new and better stuff in the new guidlines.