|
|||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
| Welcome to the WAHM Forums - WAHM.com. | ||
|
|
Welcome to WAHM Forums Already registered? Login above OR To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of the largest community of Work-At-Home Moms. The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
It is hard to be patient when each day is money lost.
(I'm a 1st year - your question does not apply to me... yet.) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members. |
|
|||
|
I saw this for the first time today at the bottom of a SxS task instruction page:
"Max tasks per rater: 2% of tasks/6% of items." Has anyone ever seen anything like that before? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
hugs, Sticks |
|
|||
|
Originally posted by Sniffy I saw this for the first time today at the bottom of a SxS task instruction page: "Max tasks per rater: 2% of tasks/6% of items." Has anyone ever seen anything like that before? What does that mean?Edited by: chrispe |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Not that i would complain if they limited my SxS to only 2% of all tasks... [img]smileys/smiley2.gif[/img]
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
hugs, Sticks |
|
|||
|
It took me 4 hours and45 minutes (!!) to read the new guidelines, watch the videos, and review all the new information and FAQ on the hub- I visited many of the examples and links. Most of that time was on the new guidelines.
|
|
|||
|
Great, Chrispe! So glad it helped! I too appreciate the sense of community this forum provides.
|
|
|||
|
To everyone who has sent an email to Google but does not get a response:
I was told today that there are only three staff members who are responsible for the Quality Rater system. I don't know if that means there are three staffmembers per language or for the whole thing. So this means that these three people are responsible for reviewing resumes, maintaining the system, etc. So if you don't get a response, don't take it personnaly. It sounds like these people are really overwored. I would think that if Google really valued the Rater system, they could at least hire a few more on-site people. But anyways, I want to thank these people for their hard work and keeping us employed. |
|
|
|
This ad will disappear if you login
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|





Linear Mode

