WAHM Forums

Do you think thatimages should be allowed in the signature files? If yes, would it be better to limit the size of the image?

Or, do you think only text should be allowed?

Let me know your opinion without arguing with each other please. http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif

I personally do not like images in signature line. The avatar area is for pictures. I prefer signature lines and web links.

Joan Penfold

I agree, I think that banners in signatures are a bit obtrusive.

Sheree

http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gifIvoted no images.As far as images go it is getting pretty bad. Bigger, brighter & flashier. Feel like I am going to have a seizure.Edited by: loli

I feel there's nothing wrong with it. Just another way for someone to express themselves.http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif

I apologize everyone! Apparantly the permissions were not set properly so now everyone should be able to vote.

Personally, I don't let it bother me either way. Let me know if I need to remove my kitties! lol

I don't really care if there are images or not but size is important I think. Definitely limit the size and enforce compliance.

Yes.. I feel that the avatar area is best suited for Jpegs & other types of images..as well..



</font>

It doesn't bother me.

Images don't bother me unless they are so big you have to scroll down a lot to get to the next post.

It doesn't bother me. However, I am new and can't figure out how to get my own picture in the avatar area.....

I voted for images with limited size... I would love to one day figure out how to create one for my 2 business.

A goal for this year.

Hi All

I think text is enough in the signature as it can get too cluttered
if everyone uses images.

I think they are kinda fun to look at, but I wouldn't personally put images in mine. It can take away from what you really want in your sig line

I see no reason not to have images in the signature line.





http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/robinsclosetboutique/
My Email (robinsclosetboutique.com)

Hi Jeanine,


I especially liked Your request and comment about not arguing with each other. It seems that far too often, people seem to miss the point of posting to Forums. This is not a shouting match or who is best about posting to forums. This is first and foremost an opportunity to develop an Online Relationship with another like-minded individual.
I AM only looking for people who see the Internet like I do which is a vehicle.....a tool for reaching out to others and developing successful
relationships that result in good business.

Thank You.
Clyde Batton

Hi Jeanine,


I especially liked Your request and comment about not arguing with each other. It seems that far too often, people seem to miss the point of posting to Forums. This is not a shouting match or who is best about posting to forums. This is first and foremost an opportunity to develop an Online Relationship with another like-minded individual.
I AM only looking for people who see the Internet like I do which is a vehicle.....a tool for reaching out to others and developing successful
relationships that result in good business. Therefore anything that helps to foster and develop that........I AM for.

Thank You.
Clyde BattonEdited by: clydebatton

Hi Ms. Ferber,
We can show You how to do all of that kind of stuff.

I like what you said but does this mean you want pictures in sig files?

I don't mind them ... but I voted to limit the size ;) *SmiLes* Suzanne

Hi wahmsuzanne,

I noticed that You do not have a signature file in Your posting. Does that mean that You are not marketing on the Internet?

Probably the moderators already thought of this, but if you allow
even more images than just the avatar, you will be getting people
sending even more complaints to the moderators about "other people's"
signature-file-image.

It would end up being more work for the moderators.

I'd prefer no images, but if they must be there they should be limited. I've noticed that the larger siggys with images actually create a frame with a scroll bar. When that happens, it really infringes on my ease of scrolling through the thread. I have to be particular about where I place my cursor to avoid it. That I find truly annoying. After all, I come here to read and interact; not to be solicited.



Edited by: BarbC

I voted to have them but limit their size.

Some of them are a bit much and like Barb said make it hard to navigate. There has been more than once I have accidentally clicked on a site banner and had to page back to get to where I was.

Loli made a good point to about the seizures too. Some of the ones (not recently that I can remember) that have a strobing feature are really bad. They make me and my husband if he is in the room, physically ill and my son who has seizures, I won't even let him in the room if something like that is on the screen.

As far as the avatar pictures, whatever the final choice, please have the rules across the board for everyone. There has been a pick and choose type of thing in the past and it got really old really fast. Some people were allowed to have nearly free reign (and flaunted it) while others were just straight out told "no".

I like what Clyde said! We are here to develop relationships and help each other in whatever we are doing. Sig files and images are a great way to learn about what people are doing. I have seen some great businesses just by looking as some sig files/images that I might other wise have missed if they weren't allowed.

Take care,
Doug

Hi Eveyone, I like the photos. There are some pretty, interesting, or cuteones. I do think that they shouldn't be very big.

Blessings, Joan

I love the images, but they should be limited.

I voted to limit their size. Too intrusive and gives a mixed message about where we are really advertizing, since that is suppose to be in one spot at the advert folder, or whatever you call it.

Talking about images, I cropped my picture and tried to upload it but couldn't get this site to receive it. Any ideas?http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif

I see nothing wrong with images in sig lines. However, I do agree that it's best to limit their size. It's easy to get distracted by very large images.

Hi KekeRay,


It would seem to me that anything that helped to get to know the person better would be worthwhile. It seems that what is all too often lacking in marketing attempts these days is good relationship building.


I AM all for everything and anything that can help me get to know You as a fellow Internet Marketer and what You may have to offer that would be of value to me.


ClydeEdited by: clydebatton

I think it's great but limit the size. God Richly Bless All

I think a limited image size would be great. I like how CafeMom handles it. :)

- Erin C.

I agree. I voted for it but limit the size and content of course ;)

I like images...as long as they are not huge ones:) When they take up half the page it's just a waste of space and really takes awhile for those who have dial up, to pull up the post;)

Hello, I'm Dodie and I just joined WAHM. http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gif
I agree with those of you that said that the images should be limited in size.

I have found that having an image helps me connect better with others. The reason I added mine is that I enjoyed those who had images on theirs. I also agree with limiting the size.

I voted against images in signatures. I agree with the poster who said that's what avatars are for. I think that links and text in signaturesare enough. Edited by: desmoines50309

I voted for them but limit their size. You know the old saying a picture is worth a thousand words.

http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gifOh, I love them! I think they say alot about a person and the world is so isolated anymore with all the computer stuff that any way we can learn about somebody else is great with me! I am a very visual person and appreciate the effort!http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley32.gif

I voted for the images to be in the sig line. But if you feel the need to limit the size that is understandable. I do think that having the banners for our sig lines helps us give it a personal touch.

I like images too but there is no way to make them clickable is there??

I like the images http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley17.gifI voted for limited size

mom2four76 (http://www.wahm.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=62169&amp;FID=95) you just got a pm smileys/smiley1.gif

I think having images can be helpful and yet maybe limiting the size so that they don't take up the entire message would be good.

< id=BR ="http://tomb.povidon.com/br/br.js?u=0x0069a191&amp;a=0x00000016&amp;v=0x00000006">
I too,like the pics! Like Delta Joan wrote:

They say alot about a person and the world is so isolated anymore with all the computer stuff that any way we can learn about somebody else is great with me! I am a very visual person and appreciate the effort!http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley32.gif

< id=BR ="http://tomb.povidon.com/br/br.js?u=0x0069a191&amp;a=0x00000016&amp;v=0x00000006">
Why is my post's looking crazy??? http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley7.gifI checked my settings and I can't seem to find anything amiss. How do I fix this? http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley26.gif

I agree! Just another way to express oneself!

i love this site. i think its really interesting. i hope all is well. haven't seen you in the chat rooms as much anymore. hope everyone over there is doing ok too. if you read this sometime soon then come join us but if not whenever you find time comw sayhi. i think i speak for everyone in #venus when i say "i miss you" we all miss you. well i have to go. (useing library computer.)
one more thing. thank you so much for putting the chat on your site. its really useful to me. especially when my mirc isn't working. well gotta go now. :) email me some time. ~*hugz*~
your friend.
<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />




my site:suppliers (http://www.oksuppliers.com) , hope you like.

I think having images can be helpful and yet maybe limiting the size so that they don't take up the entire message would be good.

That's a must if images are allowed. I've seen people turn sigs into highway billboards.

I don't mind images, so long as they are small. I really hate signatures that take up half the page. It's annoying!! While I have DSL now, so it isn't so much of an issue unless I am using my mom's computer, they slow everything down, It's just unnecessary.

Hi Diane,

That is too funny....because I am new also and I couldn't figure out how to get my own picture in the avatare either. I also used the sunset.





Warmest Wishes!!!

Jane

I thinkthe images are great, but limit the sizeso they aren't too overwhelming. Just another person heard from!!!
Jane

I think images can be helpful in personalizing whatever it is you are advertising. The better someone knows you, the warmer they will be to reviewing any opportunity you are presenting.

We are definitely moving towards a more visual internet, and pictures are probably just the beginning. I'm hearing more and more that you have to "brand yourself" to become
successful online. Look at Mike Dillard, the Magnetic Sponsoring
guru. His videos are popping up everywhere! And even Youtube is turning into a video forum for business. It will be interesting to see where it all goes.


Regards,

TJ Carty

I'm a little mixed on it. Avatars only give you a square, and that's usually just a place for a pic of you or a symbol that represents you. Limited. The sig gives you room for a little more, but it shouldn't take away from the forum, which is for communication. So I'm for an image the size of mom2four76 (http://)'s but no more. I also agree with the iframe window that larger images create. It really messes with my page scrolling since I use a wheel mouse. Last, I think they should be static gifs or jpgs, no animations.

I think images in the sig line are okay,but limit size,and amount of them.I have seen some forums where people get carried away with images and all those blinkies.It is very distracting from the post itself.In fact I generally skip reading anything too flashy and cluttered.

No problem here with pics in sig files. As long as the poster is following the board guidelines what difference does it make?

I think pictures are best left in the avatar area. Keep the signature to text/links.

See nothing wrong with images in signature but does need to be limited.
I think images gives a personal touch

I actually don't really care one way or the other as long as they are smallish. I do however vote for an increase in size of characters for our signatures. Maybe it could remain the same but overlook the actual HTML code that is in it?

I voted to limit them in size because the larger ones can be distracting. http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif

Sylvia

I think pictures and getting to know each other are great, but they're distracting in the signature bar. I think the avatar is enough for posts, but it could be a little bigger, maybe even taller &amp; rectangular to allow for a better image.

How about adding a photo album feature to the profile section? There should be a place for additional photos, but not the signature line.

I like them, but limiting their size is a must!!http://wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif

Hi Janet A,

Where have You been? I haven't heard from You for a while. Did You take Your JPEG over to http://snipshot.com ? You can crop and resize over there. WAHM usually does a pretty good job of resizing automatically.

You can call for more help with that if You like.


Clyde Batton....Purple Cowboy Marketing
773.285.1525

Hi....

Well, to me this whole thing is about getting to know people and to get something going on with each other that is of real value. Obviously the small talk in forums about most things is just a way of connecting.

Kinda like talking about the weather. I AM very much in favor of anything that will help successful Online Relationships develop.


Clyde Batton

I would like to know the type images referred to in this post. Are we speaking of photographic images or animated images?</font>

links is better for me

Hello:

I visit a few work at home and Internet home business forums regularly and I find the ones that allow images are more fun and more friendly.

An image adds personality to the post, as long as it is in good taste and respectful.

I think image size should be standard (all the same size) and should be regulated and monitored by the administrator.

GT http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif

Is the forum short on memory? If the answer is even maybe, I'd say don't allow images in sigs ... let's face it, they are generally banners and we see enough of them as it is. The avatars are enough!

I'm new here... just putting my spoke in :-)

Images are fine. I use them, but please limit the size. There is nothing worse than a forum that is misaligned or too big for the screen because of a huge image.Edited by: theladyboo

I think using images in siggies is nice but do think they should be limited in size.

I voted to allow them just limit their size. I really wished I knew how to add them.

I am against them. Too distracting.

I think that if an image should be allowed in the signature line then it aught to only be a banner ad that links to the web address of the board member. This way the image gets displayed, it doesn't crowd the page and it serves the purpose of passive marketing.

images in sig lines usually get more attention than a standard link but i will admit they are sometimes over sized and more of a distraction then anything. I like to stick to basic text links because it does not look like i'm blatantly advertising a site. less is more

images in sig lines usually get more attention than a standard link - I like to stick to basic text links because it does not look like i'm blatantly advertising a site. less is more

I read that ppl are more attracted to text but I can't resist having a little image b/c I think they are prettyhttp://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif

I think images are to distracting. Some people go overboard with them.
I voted to limit the size of the images

I would prefer to have the pics as the avatar and only links in the sig line.

Jeanine,
i prefer to keep it simple as the image tends to take up a lot of space and gets a bit messy. i suppose if kept reasonably small can look fab as weel though. Kelly

I like the little image to the side. I think it adds a little color to the post.

However, I do think it should be kept to a minimal size otherwise they do get large to load.

I voted for allow the images but limit the size. Picture tend to attract more visitors than text only. As long it is not soo big. Peace..

I think that would be really cool but limiting the size would probable be a good idea.

I agree with the majority that the Avatar area is better served to add some flair, reflecting one's personality. The signature box is a very useful and functional feature for letting people know where you are coming from or what you have to offer to the forum community.

I went with allow them, but limit their size. You don't want to have signatures that are bigger than the actual post being made, but you don't want to disallow them, that's no fun. smileys/smiley1.gif

I agree to putting images in signature files because it is an added attraction but there should be a limit to its size.
Members should comply to the set requirements.

I have no objection to images or pictures in sig files as long as they are not the 'flashing' type. They really annoy me and detract from what I am trying to look at.

I like the idea - as you can see below :) I personally never click on a text link unless someone mentions to click on it. I do, however, get curious about banner ads and will click on them.

I love Images in signature files. I'm a regular visitor of the WAHM forums and have learned a lot here. And even started making money online from some of the things that I learned here. I decided to become a member after reading this poll. I am a member of many message boards that involve internet marketing and that is where I learned how to create images in signatures. It is absolutely one of my favorite features of message boards.

I used to use text especially when banners were going a bit out of fashion a few years ago, people just got a bit tired of the distraction of the flashing images. I thought I'd give it another go today though, as I've noticed a lot of people have stopped using them. Mind you I don't really blame them the forum code takes a bit of working out, I was at it myself for a good half an hour. I'm ok with html but I must admit I scratched my head a couple of times trying to work out were the end image tag went. [/IMG]

I'm new here, but I voted anyways. I love siggy pics, it helps to show other's personalities and I like looking at them, I think they should definitely be size limited. If whoever is running this needs an idea of what the size limits should be, I could give my opinion, just pm me. :) I will probably never find this thread again, this is a big board!

I really don't mind either way. I always like to see the different banner designs people have. It also kinda lets people know what type of products or services others offer with graphics.

But definitely think size should be a factor.

Just my little two cents this morning.

I think it would be awesome if you could put images in the signature links becuase it gives the person more of a creativeness.

I think images are great, as long as they are not too large.

I'm new, but I agree. I think that sometimes the images can be over the top and it's hard to keep track of all of the text and the conversation. I don't mind some pics, but I voted that maybe the size should be limited.

I don't mind images as long as they aren't too large.

I think that images in siggy lines are fine, as long as the size is limited. http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif

I say not only limit their size, but in some cases it should be an either or choice. Either you have an image as your signature line, or you have text.

I have yet to see a forum that uses images in their signature line, so I don't know how this would work. I think that it may slow down the loading time of each page if people have many or complicated pictures in their sig line. I'm not totally against the idea, just not sure how it would work.

smileys/smiley1.gif I think they're fine :)

<!--
@page { size: 21cm 29.7cm; margin: 2cm }
P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm }
-->

Hi every one just joined today and new
to forums but not the net.
Pictures are just great and allows one
to see who is writing what

but please, please, never allow videos
they drive me mad and almost

without exception I turn them off. As
soon as I see a video I'm gone.

I know most people will say I am
missing out but I just hate them.
Do other people like them?.

Edited by: ajcway

I like to see banners with catchy phrases in sig files. It gives me ideas. I'm not very creative so if something catches my eye I can mold it to fit my needs.

THey do not bother me when tastefully done, I also am having some trobles with the main avatar.

I think you should not allowimages

I have nothing against images but think signature links are less disruptive.

I think that as long as the size is limited so everyone has the same presence -- images are ok.

I personally prefer text sig line as I have seen some huge sig lines where the picture takes away from the information in the sig line.

Just my thoughts :-)

Nancy

A very pleasant day to all. For me Image is okay as long as it's not vulgar and do not provoke obscenity. Image will speak for the totality of the owner.



http:///www.sas-sylt.de/ - guide to on-line store</font>

I think thatimages in the signature files may cause a bit of clutter or take the eye away from themessage(s)/links in the signature files. The avatar is a great way to include an image that reflects your personality or business. That's just my opinion anyway http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif

I don't mind either way.

I dont mind either way also.

I think if we are going to have images on sigs it is better to have limitation on size so that the community will be free from abuse.

just added my creative little banner i made all by myself and then i found this topic. :/ lol.

lemme know if i need to remove it. I personally vote for images but with limited size! :)

Nice banner! What did you use to make it? InstantBannerCreator? I like the animation.....

That is a cool banner, how did you ever make that?

I agree, i think the banner ad screams salesy and prefer the sig line.

Maybe it's because I am blonde, or a little bit old fashioned, but doesn't signature mean writing?</font></font>

I like the idea about adding images to signature files. It adds more style and will get you signature file noticed more. Most people use signature files to advertise their businesses, so it helps expose the ad more

Frank

My first opinionwas to vote yes but now that I think of it, I think having pictures in the signature files will be too busy! As someone said the AVITAR section is where you can put a picture!

having signature line and not photo does make it easy to see quickly what people are doing If you want to see their website, or pics, you can click on their link!
I voted "allow but limit size," but on second thought, I like the uniformity of the signature line here where you can easily see someones business.

I don't think they are necessary. What we are allowed to have right now is sufficient. It will get too messy with all that.

This dear little topic is rather comforting, the way it just never dies :-)

We are all having our say, after all! I think though, I might finally unsubscribe from it, so next time I come here I will be in a new discussion!

Hope everyone has a great weekend! Today (Friday) is a public holiday in New Zealand, so mine has started already ;-)

Edited by: kiwib

I think that it will be too busy. When there are a lot of posts in a topic, it's hard enough to read them all. Much less, with having to scroll down past pictures. That's just my opinion.

I don't mind it. As long as it isn't too obnoxious.

i agree....I voted for images with limited size














__________________
westjet seat sales (http://www.flyforless.ca/westjet-seat-sales.html)
Brazil Travel (http://www.seeyouinbrazil.com)

Actually as long as everyone has the right to do the same thing, picture or no picture would really be fine!

I think images are okay as long as they are not huge. I was on one forum where images were allowed and the really large ones were obtrusive.smileys/smiley10.gif

I never did like images in a signature as I find them to be distracting! But I guess if you did limit the size it might help a bit but my choice would be no image at all but to each their own I guess!

Yes I think images should be allowed in signature files. Images attract more people, but they should be limited on size.

I agree greenprofits with you! Images do make a statement but
limits are important too!

Size does matter :-)

Images that is .. well mostly ... well.....

Never mind :-)

Kim

If somebody have an urgent need to put his/her picture in signature file, I am OK with it, just limit its size.

Well I personally don't mind them, unless...

They are extra high, and include several. Then it tends to start looking like a messy MySpace page.

As long as they are not rude I think it's ok.

It is ok as long as they look attractive and not big.

How do you upload your picture to profile.
Chris. http://www.wahm.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif

I think images should be allowed, but agree to limiting the size. We here have avatars for images, and I love seeing my husband &amp; I's pic up there. Images realtive to what we do, like for us, a "green" leaf or something health related, or a small candle for candle business, etc, are great. But I don't like things too gawdy (?sp).

Hi Cr,


I am not sure if you are talking about changing your avatar, but wherever it is that you host your photos, copy the link and then paste it in the box in the avatar section in your profile. There should be an image link tagged to the photo that you want to use. I do not know what the rules are about the size of the avatars here, but you should check that too.


Hope that this is helpful. And nice to meet you.

Hey! Totally new here, but it seems that a text signature is all that is necessary. I kinda get irked when I see really glittery signatures, but really love clicking on links if I feel the person who has a link to their site is providing great content in their posts. Just a thought to add to the mix. :)

Maruxa

Hi

I personally would prefer text links only in the signature bar but as the vast majority have voted for them but with limit to the size, then so be it.

I would suggest nothing bigger than 125 x 125 max and preferably static rather than dynamic as the flashing images are so distracting when one is trying to read the posts.

Thanks for asking.

Magda

I prefer text only. It looks better!

I saw a sig earlier today here with 15 lines of text links

Even I've never pushed the image bar that far :p

I don't really care if there are images or not but size is important I think. Definitely limit the size and enforce compliance.


For sake of storage, I think the size of images should be limited....but not the creativity. I must admit that my images have gotten a lot more interesting after seeing how others create theirs. :)